![]() Fortunately, this is not the Crucial BX300 as we will see in the benchmarks. The MX300 was equipped with the 3D TLC NAND and the BX200 was equipped with a simple TLC NAND, which could only maintain a high writing performance via the SLC cache size. We have already explained the differences between TLC, SLC and MLC extensively in the Crucial BX200 480GB SSD Windows practice test. The four of the eight Micron NW818 Micron 3D Micron MLC NAND devices of the SSD with a total capacity of 480GB are easily recognizable. Here you can see the small SSD board together with the SSD cover and the four screws. The Crucial BX300 SSD case was no longer pressed together, but attached with screws. ![]() If necessary, the 7mm adapter frame can be placed on 9.5mm adapter frames or fixed on to the 9.5mm adapter frame to remain compatible with the 9.5mm height (e.g. The BX300 SSD is manufactured in the same way as the previous Crucial MX300, MX200, BX200, BX100 and MX100 in the flatter height, which, is only 7mm and no longer 9.5mm. The SATA SSD port is identical to conventional SATA3 hard disk drives, but a SATA3 SSD can also be operated at a slower speed on a SATA2 port. ![]() The two SATA3 connections for power supply and data connection can be seen in the following picture on the left side. The back side shows the Crucial BX300 2.5″ SSD with some technical data and the firmware version that has been preinstalled. ![]() … which looks almost identical to the previous Crucial BX200 480GB SSD. Here you can see the front of the 2.5″ Crucial BX300 480GB SSD … ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |